ActuarialExam ASTAMReinsurance
Exam ASTAM topic · 10–20% of exam

Reinsurance

Reinsurance structures including proportional and non-proportional treaties, and pricing reinsurance programs.

Per-objective worked-example outlines

For each learning objective on Reinsurance, here is the approach an exam item would test — the setup, the ordering of your reasoning, and the formula or identity you need to bring to the page. Approaches, not full solutions, by design. Verify against the current soa.org syllabus before your sitting.

Distinguish between proportional and excess of loss reinsurance structures

Setup

A primary insurer's losses are described and you must determine cessions, retentions, and net retained losses under different reinsurance structures.

Approach

Proportional (quota share, surplus share): cede a fixed percentage of premium and losses. Excess of loss (per-risk, per-occurrence, aggregate): cede losses above an attachment up to a limit. Apply each structure to the loss distribution: for XL on a single risk, ceded loss = min(X - attachment, layer width) × (1 if X > attachment else 0).

Key identity

Proportional: cede a fraction. XL: cede losses above attachment up to limit per risk/event.

Price reinsurance layers using burning cost and exposure methods

Setup

A reinsurance layer (e.g., $1M xs $1M) is to be priced and you must apply the burning cost or exposure rating method.

Approach

Burning cost: historical losses in the layer / historical premium, trended and adjusted for any known changes; apply a target loss ratio. Exposure rating: apply ILFs (increased limits factors) or exposure curves to allocate the expected ground-up loss to the layer. Burning cost requires sufficient layer experience; exposure rating works for layers above the data.

Key identity

Burning cost: trended layer losses / premium. Exposure rating: ground-up × loss share of layer.

Evaluate the impact of reinsurance on retained losses and capital

Setup

A primary insurer is comparing different reinsurance programs and must evaluate the impact on retained losses, volatility, and required capital.

Approach

Simulate or analytically derive the distribution of net retained losses under each program. Compare expected retained loss, standard deviation, VaR, and TVaR. Compute the cost (reinsurance premium less ceded losses) and capital relief. Use return on capital to compare programs at the same risk level.

Key identity

Retained loss distribution drives required capital; compare programs on net cost vs capital relief.

Common exam traps on Reinsurance

Recurring patterns where candidates lose points on Reinsurance-style items. Each entry pairs the trap with the fix.

Trap

Treating per-occurrence and aggregate XL identically.

Fix

Per-occurrence applies to each event; aggregate applies to the year's total losses; they price very differently.

Trap

Using burning cost on a high attachment with no historical losses.

Fix

Above the data, use exposure rating or extreme value methods; burning cost is unreliable.

Trap

Forgetting that surplus share involves variable cession by policy.

Fix

Surplus share cedes only the amount above the retention line; cession percentages vary by policy size.

Trap

Ignoring reinstatement premiums on XL contracts.

Fix

Reinstatements add cost when limits are exhausted; model them in pricing.

Where to find Reinsurance in popular manuals

Pointers to where each major vendor covers this topic, so you can grab the right chapter without combing the full manual. We do not reproduce vendor content — just the location. Chapter and lesson numbers shift between editions; use these as a guide, not as a citation.

ASM

Reinsurance chapters in the ASTAM manual

ACTEX

Reinsurance structures and pricing chapters

Coaching Actuaries

Learn modules on Reinsurance; Adapt category "Reinsurance"

7-day Reinsurance micro plan

A focused 7-day sub-schedule for Reinsurance specifically, at roughly 1.5–2.5 hours per day. Drop it inside your full Exam ASTAM plan as a single coverage module.

Day 1

Read the reinsurance structures chapter; build flashcards on quota share, surplus share, and XL variants.

Day 2

Drill 8 problems computing ceded and retained losses under proportional and XL.

Day 3

Burning cost pricing — 5 problems with trended layer losses.

Day 4

Exposure rating — 5 problems using ILFs or exposure curves.

Day 5

Reinstatement premium and aggregate features — 4 problems.

Day 6

Written-answer practice — 3 multi-step reinsurance problems with full work shown.

Day 7

Re-do flagged problems and rebuild the reinsurance summary.

How exclam.ai helps you master Reinsurance

Flashcards from your manual

Upload your ACTEX Exam ASTAM digital edition, scanned ASM pages, TIA handouts, or your own notes. exclam.ai extracts the Reinsurance sections and generates flashcards automatically, tuned to the exam traps above.

Worked-example drilling

Each per-objective approach above maps to a quiz template. exclam.ai re-surfaces missed items until you can recall both the setup and the key identity from cold.

FSRS spaced repetition

Because Reinsurance is 10–20% of your exam, losing it during review costs you. FSRS brings it back at the optimal moment.

Reinsurance in the Exam ASTAM context

SOA Exam ASTAM has 5 topic areas. Reinsurance is weighted at approximately 10–20% of the exam, here is where it sits relative to the other topics.

Topic areaWeight
Advanced Loss Modeling20–30%
Credibility Theory15–25%
Ratemaking15–25%
Loss Reserving20–30%
→ Reinsurance10–20%

Start practicing Reinsurance today

Upload your ACTEX Exam ASTAM digital edition, scanned ASM pages, TIA handouts, or your own notes. exclam.ai generates a fully guided study plan with adaptive flashcards and quizzes for this topic.

See pricing